I am often reminded that it is more important than ever to impact human
behavior, not just to ensure people are safe around bears, but that bears are safe around people. Everyone has heard that "A fed bear is a dead bear," but some truly don't get the meaning of that message. It really does happen...and unfortunately bears continue to die. Yet some people still don't understand that. Willful negligence, intentionally feeding bears
when you know it's wrong, is often a crime and the fault of person performing
the act. However, uninformed negligence, when folks don't realize the
consequences of their actions, is my fault and the fault of anyone else working
in the world of bear education. Therefore, we must improve the ways we reach
and speak to people if we want to exact positive change to conserve and protect
bears.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more I immerse myself into the world of wildlife
education the more I realize how ignorant I truly am on this subject. Don't get
me wrong, I feel pretty confident I know more about wildlife than the
proverbial "average bear," but where I'm often stumped, is trying to
figure out ways to influence human behavior, for that is where one's true power
lies. I am wanting to not only get folks to hear what I'm saying but to literally
reach inside and connect with them, to touch them in ways that actually helps
them to understand and hopefully influences their behavior for the betterment
of themselves and the wildlife around them. Most of the time I am a complete
failure, but every once in a while I have success. The following is an example
and although it may only be a small step, every long journey begins with that
initial step.
Over the course of the last year or so, since I began
writing my blog, I have accrued a small following of wildlife
aficionados...actually bear lovers to be exact. No shame in that, for I too am one. Occasionally these folks send me information on the "bear
happenings" around their town. I enjoy reading them and I encourage everyone to
keep them coming!
Anyway, one recent "happening" I received was a
link to an online news story about a black bear that had been killed by state
wildlife agent while it was rummaging through a dumpster behind a city hospital. The person
sharing the story, who I consider a friend, was obviously upset and wanted some
answers to a few questions that were not addressed in the story. That too was
understandable. What followed though surprised me because they were not the
same questions that came to my mind even though we had both read the exact same story. This
intrigued me.
Following the progression of the story on her FaceBook page,
there was a small but growing contingency of people expressing anger and
frustration at the wildlife agency. This even spilled into conversation from
other groups I am a part of and led to even more questions about the situation.
Isn't discharging a firearm in the city dangerous? Why
couldn't they just tranquilize the bear? Why couldn't they relocate it? Was it
really that dangerous? How could they just kill it? Have they no conscience?
This perplexed me for I could not understand the ill-feelings
toward the wildlife agency. I knew the answers to all these questions, in fact,
they were obvious to me. My understanding came from my first-hand experience
having worked as a biologist for a state wildlife agency. But what was clear to
me was ever-so muddy to them. And this was no fault whatsoever on their part.
They simply had no possible way of knowing the answers to these questions since
they had never been told. This is where we, as wildlife experts and educators,
have failed them.
First off, let me start by saying, never in my life have I
wanted to kill a bear in that situation. I am also almost certain that none of
the guys I have ever worked with ever entertained that idea either. It's a
necessary evil that unfortunately comes with the job and is usually invoked as
a last resort. After all, we went to school and dedicated our lives to wildlife
because we have a passion for animals and the places they roam.
But how do I explain this and respond to some of their
unanswered questions to a frenzied group of people that have seemingly already
drawn their conclusions?
Simple...by speaking their language and opening up a clear
line of communication.
I did a little bit of investigating and could tell by their
background information that many of the folks commenting on the page were
either hospital staff or friends of those in that profession. So against my
initial "non-interjectionary" judgement...I entered the conversation.
Instead of entering as a know-it-all, or as my son would
say, "Smarty McSmartpants," I entered as a teammate, looking for
answers to some contentious questions. I also wanted everyone to see the
"bigger picture" right out of the gate so they could start listening
with a fresh set of ears that weren't already tainted by previous statements.
Up to that point, most of the comments were focused on the action that took
place (dead bear) and how things should have been done differently.
This brings us back to MY initial question upon reading the
article. How did that bear end up being a frequent visitor around the hospital
dumpster in the first place?
Then it dawned on me and the proverbial light bulb went off, or should I say "on" in this case. I made a connection with how I could relate to them and
help them understand the issue by using something they were familiar with. I brought up the concept of... "a doctor or a nurse
treating the symptom and not the disease."
This they understood.
Placing the argument in their terms, they now had a way of
understanding that the agent was not the issue, he was only a symptom. The bear
feeding in the hospital dumpster was the real problem and the
"disease" which needed to be addressed.
Not long after I entered the conversation it was revealed to
me that there were actually four bears altogether and that folks were prone to
take selfies with them. Hospital staff would also feed them, even rolling
apples to the younger ones.
The disease did indeed reveal itself in stunning fashion.
If that issue was not resolved similar unfortunate situations
would be inevitable.
I continued my conversation with an open mind and a friendly
attitude. I was not in the least bit insulting nor did I show or have any
contempt for their actions. These were people I have never met and I knew not
their situation. In other words, I could not pass judgment on their negligence.
For all I knew they could have believed in their heart they were truly
"doing good".
Within minutes I was not only accepted but I was also
invited to give a presentation to hospital staff on " How a fed bear is a
dead bear." Sadly, in this case, I will have a shining example.
I accepted without blinking an eye and the arrangements are
in the works.
Having said all of this, I want to be crystal clear. I am
not mad at, or frustrated with, anyone at the hospital. For all I know, some of
them may sincerely believe they were helping the bears. If that is the case,
then the only one to blame is myself and other bear advocates for not reaching
these folks before an issue was created. There is no sense berating anyone
because I promise you, a conversation has never been started and an argument
has never been won with an insult.
And this is one presentation I am so looking forward to
giving.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On a Side Note: It turns out the bear was not even killed by a state wildlife agent so I urge folks to gather all facts before formulating an opinion. And I'm sure some of you may already realize this but the media is not always the best source of information. :)